Seat Exeo 2012 vs SAAB 9-3 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Seat Exeo is available only with front wheel drive, while SAAB 9-3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 210 HP | 122 - 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 350 NM | 167 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 - 10.6 seconds | 6.1 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 7.7 | 5.3 - 10.6 | |
|
Seat Exeo petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3. On average, Seat Exeo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
| Seat Exeo is 1 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 425 litres | |
|
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Seat Exeo has 35 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`999 | ~ 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |