Seat Exeo 2012 vs Nissan Almera 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 - 210 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 230 - 350 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 - 10.6 seconds | 10.9 - 12.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 7.7 | 7.2 - 8.5 | |
Seat Exeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.52 m | |
Seat Exeo is larger, but lower. Seat Exeo and Nissan Almera are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 500 litres | |
Nissan Almera has more luggage space. Seat Exeo has 40 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`999 | ~ 1`625 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |