Seat Exeo 2012 vs Skoda Rapid 2017

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Seat Exeo
2012 -
Skoda Rapid
2017 -
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.01.0 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 120 - 210 HP90 - 125 HP
Torque: 230 - 350 NM160 - 250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.1 - 10.6 seconds8.9 - 11.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.9 - 7.74.0 - 4.8
Seat Exeo petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Rapid. On average, Seat Exeo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.30 m
Width: 1.77 m1.71 m
Height: 1.43 m1.46 m
Seat Exeo is larger, but slightly lower.
Seat Exeo is 36 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 7 cm wider, while the height of Seat Exeo is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres415 litres
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity.
Seat Exeo has 45 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Rapid.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`999~ 1`684
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): no data7800
Pros and Cons: Seat Exeo has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Skoda Rapid has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv