Seat Exeo 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Seat Exeo is available only with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi ASX can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 210 HP | 114 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 350 NM | 154 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 - 10.6 seconds | 10.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 7.7 | 4.6 - 8.1 | |
|
Seat Exeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. On average, Seat Exeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Seat Exeo is larger, but lower. Seat Exeo is 37 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Exeo is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
| Seat Exeo has 18 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Seat Exeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`999 | ~ 2`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |