Seat Exeo 2012 vs Mazda 3 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Seat Exeo is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 210 HP | 116 - 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 350 NM | 153 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 - 10.6 seconds | 10.3 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 7.7 | 4.6 - 7.8 | |
|
Seat Exeo petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Seat Exeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo and Mazda 3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 450 litres | |
| Seat Exeo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`999 | ~ 1`905 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |