Seat Exeo 2012 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 210 HP | 141 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 350 NM | 195 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 - 10.6 seconds | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 7.7 | 6.1 - 9.3 | |
|
Seat Exeo petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Epica. On average, Seat Exeo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Seat Exeo is smaller. Seat Exeo is 14 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Epica, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 480 litres | |
| Seat Exeo has 20 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`999 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
| |