Seat Exeo 2009 vs Mazda 6 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Seat Exeo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda 6 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 102 - 211 HP | 120 - 185 HP | |
Torque: | 148 - 350 NM | 165 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 13.1 seconds | 8.3 - 11.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 9.6 | 5.6 - 8.2 | |
Seat Exeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, a Seat Exeo with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 505 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1751 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Seat Exeo has 63 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`029 | ~ 2`051 | |
Safety: | |||
The Mazda 6 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 4400 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |