Seat Exeo 2012 vs SAAB 9-5 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Seat Exeo
2012 -
SAAB 9-5
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.01.9 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 120 - 210 HP150 - 260 HP
Torque: 230 - 350 NM240 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 11.1 seconds7.3 - 12.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0 - 7.76.7 - 10.6
Seat Exeo petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-5. On average, Seat Exeo equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.84 m
Width: 1.77 m1.79 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Seat Exeo is smaller.
Seat Exeo is 17 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 442 litres416 litres
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Seat Exeo has 26 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-5. The SAAB 9-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`051~ 1`800
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 62002200
Pros and Cons: Seat Exeo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
SAAB 9-5 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv