Seat Exeo 2012 vs Volvo V60 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Seat Exeo is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 210 HP | 115 - 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 350 NM | 240 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 11.1 seconds | 6.2 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 7.7 | 4.5 - 10.2 | |
|
Seat Exeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V60. On average, Seat Exeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Seat Exeo is 4 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 430 litres | |
| Seat Exeo has 12 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`051 | ~ 2`129 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |