Seat Exeo 2012 vs Jaguar XF 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Seat Exeo is available only with front wheel drive, while Jaguar XF can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 210 HP | 163 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 350 NM | 365 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 11.1 seconds | 6.2 - 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 7.7 | 4.5 - 6.8 | |
|
Seat Exeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XF. On average, Seat Exeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Seat Exeo is smaller. Seat Exeo is 29 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 565 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Seat Exeo has 123 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Seat Exeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`051 | ~ 2`261 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |