Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Toyota Celica 1999

 
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Toyota Celica
1999 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 110 HP143 HP
Torque: 235 NM172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds8.7 seconds
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 33 HP less power than Toyota Celica, but torque is 63 NM more than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.87.7
Real fuel consumption: 5.7 l/100km7.8 l/100km
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway880 km on highway
780 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption
Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.34 m
Width: 1.64 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.32 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but higher.
Seat Cordoba is 18 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): no data3000
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Toyota Celica has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv