Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 71 HP | |
Torque: | 235 NM | 125 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive. Seat Cordoba engine produces 39 HP more power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Citroen Xsara. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.2 | |
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Cordoba consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.16 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | above average | |
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |