Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Citroen Xsara 2000

 
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP71 HP
Torque: 235 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds15.8 seconds
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 39 HP more power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Citroen Xsara. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.86.2
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Cordoba consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway1080 km on highway
Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.19 m
Width: 1.64 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.40 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher.
Seat Cordoba is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Citroen Xsara has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv