Seat Cordoba 2000 vs Citroen Xsara 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 112 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 155 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive. Seat Cordoba engine produces 44 HP more power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Citroen Xsara. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.3 | |
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Cordoba consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.16 m | 4.17 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 1 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Seat Cordoba has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |