Seat Cordoba 2000 vs Citroen Xsara 1998

 
Seat Cordoba
2000 - 2003
Citroen Xsara
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 156 HP112 HP
Torque: 210 NM155 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 seconds10.7 seconds
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 44 HP more power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Citroen Xsara. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.88.3
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Cordoba consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 570 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
750 km on highway850 km on highway
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.17 m
Width: 1.64 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.40 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher.
Seat Cordoba is 1 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Seat Cordoba has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably better
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Citroen Xsara has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv