Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 69 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Chrysler Neon. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 7.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Cordoba engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Skoda Felicia | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Cordoba might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but higher. Seat Cordoba is 22 cm shorter than the Chrysler Neon, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.8 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon, which means Seat Cordoba can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |