Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Diesel (Seat Cordoba) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 HP | 280 HP | |
Torque: | 128 NM | 372.6 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Seat Cordoba engine produces 216 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, whereas torque is 244.6 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 10.0 | |
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Cordoba consumes 5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 750 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Cordoba engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 20 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Skoda Felicia | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 4.35 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 21 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, 13 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means Seat Cordoba can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
| |