Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Rover 400 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 25 HP less power than Rover 400, but torque is 2 NM more than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.8 | |
| Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 510 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 35 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres less than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 400 has
| |