Seat Cordoba 1997 vs Rover 400 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 40 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.8 | |
| Seat Cordoba consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 35 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres less than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 400 has
| |