Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Skoda Felicia 1996
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive. Seat Cordoba engine produces 25 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Skoda Felicia. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Felicia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Cordoba is 28 cm longer than the Skoda Felicia, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Seat Cordoba can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Seat Cordoba has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |