Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Alfa Romeo 156 1997

 
Seat Cordoba
1996 - 1999
Alfa Romeo 156
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP155 HP
Torque: 125 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.4 seconds8.6 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 80 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 62 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.68.5
Real fuel consumption: 7.5 l/100km9.2 l/100km
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway950 km on highway
600 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Alfa Romeo 156 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.43 m
Width: 1.64 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller.
Seat Cordoba is 29 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data380 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 1.1 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Seat Cordoba can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 9001`770
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

low
Seat Cordoba has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv