Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Rover 400 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 112 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 37 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
600 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 35 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres less than that of the Rover 400. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`640 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 400 has
| |