Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Rover 400 1996

 
Seat Cordoba
1996 - 1999
Rover 400
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP112 HP
Torque: 125 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.4 seconds10.8 seconds
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 37 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.67.1
Real fuel consumption: 7.5 l/100km7.9 l/100km
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 75 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway1010 km on highway
600 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.49 m
Width: 1.64 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.39 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher.
Seat Cordoba is 35 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data810 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres less than that of the Rover 400.
Gross weight (kg): 9001`640
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons:
    Rover 400 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv