Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 372.6 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Seat Cordoba engine produces 205 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, whereas torque is 247.6 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 10.0 | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Cordoba consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 21 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, 13 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means Seat Cordoba can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
| |