Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Rover 400 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 103 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 127 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 43 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
650 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 35 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres less than that of the Rover 400. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`550 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Rover 400 has
| |