Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Rover 400 1998

 
Seat Cordoba
1996 - 1999
Rover 400
1998 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP103 HP
Torque: 116 NM127 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.7 seconds11.8 seconds
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 43 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.9 l/100km
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway1050 km on highway
650 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.49 m
Width: 1.64 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.39 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher.
Seat Cordoba is 35 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data810 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres less than that of the Rover 400.
Gross weight (kg): 7501`550
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • lower fuel consumption
Rover 400 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv