Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Seat Toledo 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Seat Cordoba and Seat Toledo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller. Seat Cordoba is 28 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |
