Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Ford Mondeo 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Seat Cordoba engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Despite less power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Seat Cordoba 1999 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Seat Cordoba 1999 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller. Seat Cordoba is 57 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Ford Mondeo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Ford Mondeo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |