Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Volkswagen Bora 1998

 
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2000
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP101 HP
Torque: 135 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds12 seconds
Volkswagen Bora is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 26 HP less power than Volkswagen Bora, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Bora. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.27.5
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway940 km on highway
610 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Bora gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.38 m
Width: 1.64 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller.
Seat Cordoba is 22 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Bora, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data785 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Bora.
Gross weight (kg): 8001`720
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Volkswagen Bora has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv