Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 126 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 40 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.7 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
830 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.16 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Cordoba is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 438 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 789 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`610 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |