Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Seat Toledo 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 40 HP less power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Seat Toledo. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Seat Toledo 1999 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Seat Toledo 1999 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller. Seat Cordoba is 28 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Seat Toledo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Seat Toledo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |