Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Kia RIO 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 108 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Kia RIO is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 48 HP less power than Kia RIO, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Kia RIO. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.3 | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Cordoba consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller. Seat Cordoba is 6 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 261 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 1.5 metres more than that of the Kia RIO, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Seat Cordoba has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia RIO has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Kia RIO has
| |