Seat Cordoba 2003 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 19 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.4 | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Cordoba consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Seat Cordoba is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |