Seat Cordoba 2003 vs Seat Cordoba 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Seat Cordoba 2003 is more dynamic to drive. Seat Cordoba 2003 engine produces 30 HP more power than Seat Cordoba 2006, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Seat Cordoba 2006. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
The Seat Cordoba 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba 2003 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba 2003 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba 2003 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba 2006. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
760 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Cordoba 2003 and Seat Cordoba 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 485 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |