Seat Cordoba 2003 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Seat Cordoba) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Lancer) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Seat Cordoba engine produces 5 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, but torque is 134 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Seat Cordoba is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
| |