Seat Cordoba 2003 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 126 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
530 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
Seat Cordoba is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Cordoba is 6 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 438 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 789 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`655 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |