Seat Cordoba 2003 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Seat Cordoba and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Cordoba consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Cordoba is 6 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 438 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 789 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |