Seat Cordoba 2003 vs Ford Focus 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 126 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Ford Focus is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba and Ford Focus have the same engine power, but Seat Cordoba torque is 19 NM less than Ford Focus. Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
The Ford Focus is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
530 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
Seat Cordoba is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 490 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Focus. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`615 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Ford Focus has
| |