Seat Cordoba 2003 vs Chrysler Neon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 177 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Seat Cordoba engine produces 33 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 51 NM less than Chrysler Neon. Despite less power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 440 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 11 cm shorter than the Chrysler Neon, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |