Seat Cordoba 2003 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004

 
Seat Cordoba
2003 - 2006
Mitsubishi Lancer
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP98 HP
Torque: 126 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds11.8 seconds
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 2 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, but torque is 24 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.7
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Cordoba consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway900 km on highway
530 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.48 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Seat Cordoba is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data430 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`750
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • lower price
Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv