Seat Cordoba 2003 vs Kia RIO 2003

 
Seat Cordoba
2003 - 2006
Kia RIO
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP97 HP
Torque: 126 NM132 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds14.2 seconds
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 3 HP more power than Kia RIO, but torque is 6 NM less than Kia RIO. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.68.3
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Cordoba consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle540 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway650 km on highway
Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.24 m
Width: 1.70 m1.68 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Cordoba is 4 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data326 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters9.5 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 1.1 metres more than that of the Kia RIO, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Kia RIO has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv