Seat Cordoba 2003 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, but torque is 6 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Cordoba consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Seat Cordoba is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |