Seat Cordoba 2007 vs Citroen Xsara 2000

 
Seat Cordoba
2007 - 2009
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 105 HP110 HP
Torque: 153 NM147 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds9.7 seconds
Citroen Xsara is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 5 HP less power than Citroen Xsara, but torque is 6 NM more than Citroen Xsara. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.96.9
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ...  More about Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.19 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.40 m
Seat Cordoba is 9 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Cordoba is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 485 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons:
    Citroen Xsara has
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv