Seat Cordoba 2007 vs Skoda Fabia 2008

 
Seat Cordoba
2007 - 2009
Skoda Fabia
2008 - 2010
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 80 HP80 HP
Torque: 195 NM195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds13.7 seconds
Seat Cordoba and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.64.8
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km4.9 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 970 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
800 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.24 m
Width: 1.70 m1.64 m
Height: 1.44 m1.50 m
Seat Cordoba is larger, but lower.
Seat Cordoba is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1226 litres
Seat Cordoba has 5 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`665
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 14002200
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • lower price
Skoda Fabia has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv