Seat Cordoba 2006 vs Citroen Xsara 2000

 
Seat Cordoba
2006 - 2007
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP75 HP
Torque: 128 NM120 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds12.7 seconds
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 25 HP more power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Citroen Xsara. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.7
Seat Cordoba consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.19 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.40 m
Seat Cordoba is 9 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Cordoba is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 485 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Citroen Xsara has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv