Seat Cordoba 2006 vs Mazda 3 2006

 
Seat Cordoba
2006 - 2009
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 85 HP105 HP
Torque: 130 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds11 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.57.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km7.9 l/100km
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
680 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ...  More about Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.49 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.47 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller.
Seat Cordoba is 21 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1285 litres
Seat Cordoba has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Seat Cordoba has 72 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): 8001`710
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 14002600
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv