Seat Cordoba 2006 vs Citroen Xsara 2000

 
Seat Cordoba
2006 - 2009
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 70 HP75 HP
Torque: 112 NM120 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.7 seconds12.7 seconds
Citroen Xsara is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 5 HP less power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Citroen Xsara. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.7
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Cordoba consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.19 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.40 m
Seat Cordoba is 9 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Cordoba is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 485 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara.
Gross weight (kg): 8001`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • lower fuel consumption
Citroen Xsara has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv