Seat Cordoba 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 1995
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 64 HP | |
Torque: | 235 NM | 124 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive. Seat Cordoba engine produces 46 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 111 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.6 | |
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Cordoba consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
Seat Cordoba is 42 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 245 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 975 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`435 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | high | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |