Seat Cordoba 1998 vs Skoda Felicia 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive. Seat Cordoba engine produces 26 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Skoda Felicia. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Felicia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Felicia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Felicia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Cordoba is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia. | |||
| Gross weight: | 800 kg | 1`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Seat Cordoba has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |