Seat Cordoba 1998 vs Seat Inca 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive. Seat Cordoba engine produces 26 HP more power than Seat Inca, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Seat Inca. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 54 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Inca engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Inca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1436 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Seat Inca has
| |