Seat Cordoba 1998 vs Citroen Berlingo 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 108 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 33 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Berlingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Berlingo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen Berlingo 2000 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Berlingo 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.80 m | |
| Seat Cordoba is 3 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 37 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 624 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2800 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Seat Cordoba can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |