Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Peugeot 307 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive. Seat Cordoba and Peugeot 307 have the same engine power, but Seat Cordoba torque is 5 NM more than Peugeot 307. Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Volkswagen Bora, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Cordoba might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller. Seat Cordoba is 26 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1540 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`984 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Seat Cordoba has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 307 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |