Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Skoda Fabia 2001

 
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 68 HP101 HP
Torque: 133 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.6 seconds11.6 seconds
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 33 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 107 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.24.9
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Cordoba consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway1120 km on highway
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.22 m
Width: 1.64 m1.65 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Cordoba is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data426 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1225 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`695
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 8001200
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • lower price
Skoda Fabia has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv