Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 64 HP | |
Torque: | 133 NM | 125 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.6 seconds | 18.3 seconds | |
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive. Seat Cordoba engine produces 4 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.8 | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.16 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Cordoba is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 426 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1225 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`675 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |