Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Skoda Fabia 2001

 
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 68 HP64 HP
Torque: 133 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.6 seconds18.3 seconds
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 4 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.24.8
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway1120 km on highway
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.22 m
Width: 1.64 m1.65 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Cordoba is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data426 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1225 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`675
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • more power
  • lower price
Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv